<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When A Film Goes Digital</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openbusiness.cc/2005/12/06/when-a-film-goes-digital/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openbusiness.cc/2005/12/06/when-a-film-goes-digital/</link>
	<description>the Open Business Project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:42:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kerryn</title>
		<link>http://www.openbusiness.cc/2005/12/06/when-a-film-goes-digital/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>kerryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbusiness.cc/2005/12/06/when-a-film-goes-digital/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Sonderbergh, in the interview, says that this can be a way to combat piracy.  That reminds me of the case in August this year where Depeche Mode&#039;s latest video of their new track Precious was offered illegally as a pre-release. The pirated video was traced to Poland (http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/results?title=IFPI) and the &#039;offenders&#039; were arrested.  The  band were filmed against a flat blue screen as digital imagery was to be added to the video later, but the pre-release showed the band performing against a blue backdrop with nothing else (in other words, I&#039;m sure that some people would watch the pirated version but still wish to see the &#039;real&#039; version anyway).  However, the furore that was created with this pre-release trace-and-raid has probably helped Depeche Mode&#039;s record label&#039;s no-doubt extremely costly marketing campaign, for Free!  They should be saying thanks to the Polish fiends and offering them a full english breakfast in jail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonderbergh, in the interview, says that this can be a way to combat piracy.  That reminds me of the case in August this year where Depeche Mode&#8217;s latest video of their new track Precious was offered illegally as a pre-release. The pirated video was traced to Poland (<a href="http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/results?title=IFPI" rel="nofollow">http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/results?title=IFPI</a>) and the &#8216;offenders&#8217; were arrested.  The  band were filmed against a flat blue screen as digital imagery was to be added to the video later, but the pre-release showed the band performing against a blue backdrop with nothing else (in other words, I&#8217;m sure that some people would watch the pirated version but still wish to see the &#8216;real&#8217; version anyway).  However, the furore that was created with this pre-release trace-and-raid has probably helped Depeche Mode&#8217;s record label&#8217;s no-doubt extremely costly marketing campaign, for Free!  They should be saying thanks to the Polish fiends and offering them a full english breakfast in jail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

